There are television cases that are etched into the collective memory. Not for easy sensationalism or calculated drama, but because they portray something much more uncomfortable: the real limits of what a television show can do for someone. Aitor's case on Hermano Mayor is exactly that. A young man from Barakaldo who went through the hands of Pedro García Aguado and whose story ended in a way that no one, absolutely no one, wanted to imagine.
If you are here looking for what happened to Aitor after the show, the honest answer is that there is no happy ending to tell. But there is much to understand.
Who Aitor Was and Why He Came to Hermano Mayor
Aitor appeared in the third season of Hermano Mayor, aired on Cuatro. He was a young man from northern Spain with a family history that was heavy enough to weigh anyone down: his mother had committed suicide and his father had died from drugs. He lived with an aunt and his grandmother.
With that baggage, Aitor had developed a strong addiction to drugs, regularly mixing substances. He was not a troubled kid by choice. He was someone to whom life had given few reasons to move forward and too many to remain stuck where he was.
Pedro García Aguado described the case as one of the most serious he had dealt with on the show. And that, coming from someone who has seen it all over eight editions, is no small comment.
The Dilemma of Pedro García Aguado
What makes this case particularly interesting is not just what happened afterwards, but how it was experienced during the recording. García Aguado faced a real problem: Hermano Mayor was filmed in ten days. A serious recovery from addiction requires between two to five years of work. The math didn't add up.
The presenter directly told the show's director that if she wanted the case to end with his face and signature, Aitor should end up in a therapeutic centre. Not as a television closure, but as the only minimally responsible way out.
And then he did something that few television presenters would do: he paid out of his own pocket the 3,000 euros for the tuition of a rehabilitation centre in Bilbao to leave Aitor at the door. The production company reimbursed him later, but the gesture says a lot about the personal involvement García Aguado had in each case.
The Outcome No One Wanted
The family was relieved. The show had ended and Aitor was admitted. It seemed that, for once, things might go well.
They lasted three days.
Barely three days after being admitted, Aitor escaped from the centre and returned to his grandmother's house, where he had marijuana hidden. The woman refused to let him in, and during the struggle, the young man managed to enter the home and stabbed her.
Pedro García Aguado has recounted this on several occasions with disconcerting honesty: "I don't know if he killed her or left her injured, but it was one of the saddest and most painful cases I've lived through." The fact that the presenter himself is uncertain about how it ended already says a lot about the secrecy that surrounded the case afterwards.
What is Known About Aitor Today
Here comes the part that frustrates those seeking answers the most: after the attack on his grandmother in Barakaldo, little more was publicly known about Aitor. His trail was lost in the media, leaving the question of his fate open.
There are no public statements, no reappearance on social media, no reconciliation interview. Nothing. The silence is total. And in a way, that silence is the only answer to the question of what happened to him.
What is known is that his story has resurfaced strongly on the internet, especially on TikTok and YouTube, where content creators have analysed the episode with millions of views. Aitor's case has become one of those topics that new generations discover and cannot stop commenting on, even though the event is now over a decade old.
Why This Case Still Matters
There is something in Aitor's story that goes far beyond sensationalism. It is a direct window into the limits of the television format when faced with problems that require years of professional intervention. A ten-day programme cannot undo the damage of a broken childhood, a severe addiction, and the absence of a real support network.
Aitor's case became an example of the limits of television intervention against serious issues like drug addiction, and it continues to be mentioned whenever the real impact of Hermano Mayor on the lives of its participants is analysed.
Hermano Mayor was, with all its contradictions, a programme that tried to do something. But television has its rules and human problems have theirs, and they rarely coincide. Aitor's case is probably the most extreme example of that incompatibility.
What Aitor Left in Pedro García Aguado
Aitor also marked the presenter. García Aguado has acknowledged in interviews and podcasts that this was the case he talks about the most when someone asks him about the hardest moments of the programme. Not as a shocking anecdote, but as a wound that never fully healed.
That, in a man who spent eight seasons witnessing extreme situations, says a lot.
The truth is that questions like "What happened to Aitor from Hermano Mayor?" do not have a satisfactory answer. There is only silence, a story that takes your breath away, and the certainty that some cases transcend what any camera can capture or resolve.





