Friday, 14 August 2026Madrid 38°/ 24°Petrol

Breaking

Vox requests the removal of LGTBI flags from Madrid City Hall

Vox demands the removal of LGTBI flags from Madrid City Hall ahead of Pride.

Margarita SiveraMargarita Sivera· · 3 min read

The municipal group Vox has demanded the removal of LGTBI flags from the City Hall building, arguing that only the Spanish flag should fly in institutions. This action comes in the context of LGTB Pride.

The controversy over symbolism in public buildings is once again at the centre of political debate in Madrid. The Vox Municipal Group has submitted a formal document to the president of the Plenary, Borja Fanjul, requesting the immediate removal of unofficial flags and banners placed by the PSOE on the facade of the Municipal Groups Building. This request comes just before the celebrations of LGTB Pride, an event that seeks to raise awareness and advocate for the rights of the LGTBIQ+ community.

The spokesperson for Vox, Javier Ortega Smith, has expressed his stance through social media, arguing that "the only flag that represents everyone is the Spanish one." According to him, institutional buildings should maintain neutrality regarding any type of symbolism. Ortega Smith criticized the PSOE for what he considers an imposition of partisan symbols that do not represent all citizens.

The controversy intensified when the Socialist Municipal Group placed a large banner with the slogan "Madrid as a flag," alongside a trans flag and a rainbow flag. This action was seen by Vox as an attempt to promote a specific political agenda within public institutions. Ortega Smith defended that "in the Spanish flag, we are all absolutely represented: heterosexuals, homosexuals, gays, lesbians," emphasising that there should be no place for symbols that divide citizens.

This conflict is not new; a year ago, the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid (TSJM) annulled a previous ruling that prohibited the placement of rainbow flags on the balconies of the same municipal building. The judicial decision was the result of an appeal filed by Ortega Smith years ago and nullified a precautionary order issued in July 2022.

The discussion about which symbols should be visible in public spaces reflects broader tensions over identity and political representation. While some argue that it is essential to make all identities visible within the public space, others contend that this can lead to unnecessary divisions among different social groups.

As the LGTB Pride festivities approach this month, it is likely that this controversy will continue to generate debate both inside and outside the City Hall. Interested citizens can follow the scheduled activities to celebrate this significant date for the LGTBIQ+ community, as well as actively participate in discussions about representation and inclusion.