Friday, 14 August 2026Madrid 38°/ 24°Petrol

Breaking

FIFA and UEFA Examine RFEF Ethical Reforms Amid Negreira Scandal

FIFA and UEFA are reviewing a critical report on ethical reforms in the RFEF as the Negreira scandal continues.

Rodrigo PeláezRodrigo Peláez· · 2 min read

A report that shakes the foundations of Spanish football

The controversy surrounding the Negreira case has led FIFA to scrutinise a document titled Pelícano 2.0, which investigates the modifications made to the RFEF Ethical Code. This analysis, which has also been sent to UEFA, could have significant repercussions for the future of Spanish football.

According to a report published by The Objective, the reforms approved in June 2021 by the RFEF General Assembly are particularly relevant, as they coincide with a critical period related to the Negreira case. The document raises serious doubts about whether the proper procedures were followed to implement these changes, suggesting that they were not adequately discussed during the relevant assemblies.

One of the most damning criticisms of the report is that the new Ethical Code would have shortened the timeframes for pursuing corruption-related offences. Unlike previous versions, which allowed for broader margins to act against such conduct, the 2021 reform seems to align more closely with ordinary regulations, which could weaken the internal control mechanisms within the federation.

The analysis comes at a delicate time, as the Negreira case remains open following revelations about payments made by FC Barcelona to companies linked to the former vice-president of the Technical Committee of Referees, José María Enríquez Negreira. These payments have been confirmed as part of an ongoing judicial investigation, although definitive responsibilities have yet to be determined.

Despite the potential impact of the Pelícano 2.0 report, both FIFA and UEFA have indicated that no formal proceedings have been opened nor have any concrete measures been taken so far. The process is currently in the document review phase and does not necessarily imply an immediate punitive decision.

Rodrigo Peláez

Written by

Rodrigo Peláez